Consider the following statements
P : Suman is brilliant
Q : Suman is rich
R : Suman is honest
The negation of the statement "Suman is brilliant and dishonest if and only if Suman is rich" can be expressed as :
Negation of (P Ù ~ R) « Q is ~ ((PÙ ~ R) « Q)
It may also be written as ~ (Q « (PÙ ~ R))
We are given three statements:
We need to find the negation of the statement: "Suman is brilliant and dishonest if and only if Suman is rich".
First, we express the given statement in logical form.
"Suman is brilliant and dishonest" can be written as P ∧ (¬R), since dishonest is the negation of honest.
"if and only if Suman is rich" means this is equivalent to Q.
So, the entire statement is: (P ∧ (¬R)) ↔ Q
Using MathML:
We need the negation: ¬[(P ∧ (¬R)) ↔ Q]
Recall that for a biconditional statement A ↔ B, its negation is equivalent to A ⊕ B (exclusive OR), or more precisely, ¬(A ↔ B) ≡ (A ∧ ¬B) ∨ (¬A ∧ B)
Applying this here, with A = (P ∧ ¬R) and B = Q:
¬[(P ∧ ¬R) ↔ Q] ≡ [(P ∧ ¬R) ∧ ¬Q] ∨ [¬(P ∧ ¬R) ∧ Q]
Using MathML:
We can simplify the second part: ¬(P ∧ ¬R) ≡ (¬P ∨ R) by De Morgan's Law.
So the negation becomes: [(P ∧ ¬R) ∧ ¬Q] ∨ [(¬P ∨ R) ∧ Q]
This is a valid form of the negation, but we need to compare it to the given options.
Let's look at the options (note: in the original text, Ù is used for ∧ (AND) and « is used for ↔ (if and only if). This is a font encoding issue. We will interpret them correctly:
Option 2 directly matches the negation we found in Step 2.
The negation of the statement "Suman is brilliant and dishonest if and only if Suman is rich" is ~ (Q ↔ (P ∧ ~ R)).
Using proper logical symbols:
These laws are fundamental for simplifying and manipulating logical statements, especially when finding negations.